autopost
gamescore
Sep 29, 2010
11:25 PM | | ;
|
09/29 : Banditos defeat Hokies 15-6
Banditos improve to 2-2 on the season, while Hokies drop to 3-1.
The victory gets Banditos back on the winning track after a loss in their last game.
The loss ended a 3 game winning streak for Hokies. .
This was the first meeting between these two teams.
Next up for Hokies is The Union (3-0). That game is scheduled for Oct 06 2010, 20:00 at Lake Fairfax#1.
Banditos will face off against Cougars (0-4) on Oct 06 2010, 21:00 at Lake Fairfax#1.
|
| |
|
??
Sep 29, 2010
11:42 PM | | | ; |
15-6 ? game of field goals tonight?
| |
|
no
Sep 30, 2010
0:11 AM | | | ; |
banditos scored 2 TDs and kicked a field goal. missed a two point conversion. hokies cored a TD and missed the xtra point.
| |
|
b+
Sep 30, 2010
9:45 AM | | | ; |
recap here? Banditos turning it around? I thought hokies were the team to beat
| |
|
word on the street
Sep 30, 2010
10:00 AM | | | ; |
hokies didn`t have their starting qb
| |
|
Spectator
Sep 30, 2010
10:47 AM | | | ; |
Hokies threw a int from their own 10 that resulted in a td.
| |
|
Spectator
Sep 30, 2010
10:48 AM | | | ; |
Hokies threw a int from their own 10 that resulted in a td.
| |
|
Spectator
Sep 30, 2010
10:49 AM | | | ; |
Hokies threw a int from their own 10 that resulted in a td.
| |
|
ok
Sep 30, 2010
10:51 AM | | | ; |
anything more? Banditos look good last night
| |
|
Spectator
Sep 30, 2010
11:05 AM | | | ; |
Hokies threw a int from their own 10 that resulted in a td.
| |
|
...
Sep 30, 2010
11:31 AM | | | ; |
Hokies were 3-0 last night entering the game. Their 3 wins were against the bottom 3 teams in the division.... maybe that says something about how good they really are.
| |
|
Spectator
Sep 30, 2010
11:32 AM | | | ; |
Hokies threw a int from their own 10 that resulted in a td.
| |
|
b+
Sep 30, 2010
12:59 PM | | | ; |
thats a good call. I guess we`ll see how tough they are over the next few weeks
| |
|
hokies
Sep 30, 2010
1:23 PM | | | ; |
vs union next week. should be a good one
| |
|
Hokies
Sep 30, 2010
1:32 PM | | | ; |
Qb was out, banditas woulda gotten stomped.
| |
|
but
Sep 30, 2010
1:46 PM | | | ; |
they didn`t. Teams are always missing players.
| |
|
eh..
Sep 30, 2010
1:52 PM | | | ; |
union had their back up play against g-unit, but still won. it all depends on what your depth chart looks like. gotta be able to win with anyone you put on the field
| |
|
not a valid point^
Sep 30, 2010
1:56 PM | | | ; |
Union is good and Gunit sux
| |
|
hokies Qb
Sep 30, 2010
2:30 PM | |
he has
Sep 30, 2010
3:27 PM | | | ; |
more chemistry with the offense. Not sure if their defense showed up or not
| |
|
@ not a valid point
Sep 30, 2010
4:05 PM | | | ; |
union will lose tonight
| |
|
and
Sep 30, 2010
4:13 PM | | | ; |
banditos played with their backup QB two weeks ago and won. its part of the game. good teams have depth.
| |
|
not true
Sep 30, 2010
5:21 PM | | | ; |
very few teams dont suffer a noticeable dropoff if their starting qb is out. unless your starter sucks.
| |
|
@not true
Sep 30, 2010
6:45 PM | | | ; |
most teams don`t have 2 qb`s
| |
|
not true
Sep 30, 2010
7:27 PM | | | ; |
exactly. which is why when they starter is out and they put the second option back there it usually doesnt work out well. playing qb is difficult as is, when you only do it once or twice a year things happen at a speed you`re just not accustomed to, especially in the B+ and A leagues with good rushers
| |
|
Hollywood
Greyhounds
asst coach |  |
Sep 30, 2010
7:36 PM | | | ; |
Not having your QB is the toughest position to over come.
| |
|
WHY
Oct 01, 2010
7:36 PM | | | ; |
arent bandidiots in A? They won B+. I know its been asked alot, but there hasnt been an answer. WHY DIDNT THEY MAN UP
| |
|
Lumpy
Greyhounds |  |
Oct 01, 2010
8:20 PM | | | ; |
From the registration page:
A: Though we recommend new teams do not start in "A", any team can register for "A". Last Fall`s B+ top 4 must play in A if A does not fill.
That is why. `A` was filled up. So instead of asking them to "Man up" Why don`t you look at yourself and get better?
Before someone mentions Union, I will. I believe should be in `A`. However, `A` has only 8 spots; it comes down to who registered first. We didn`t obviously.
See you out on the field - And remember to have fun.
| |
|
Yes and no
Oct 01, 2010
8:56 PM | | | ; |
Union registered late and it was full. But that wasnt the case with Banditos, there was still plenty of room in A when they registered
| |
|
@ WHY
Oct 02, 2010
1:27 PM | | | ; |
identify yourself. AND ask tom.
| |
|
Tom?
Oct 02, 2010
5:58 PM | | | ; |
Instead of why identifying himself, why doesn`t Tom tell explain why the top four in B+ were not moved up. I`m sure there was a reason why the Banditos did not move up.
| |
|
why
Oct 02, 2010
6:16 PM | | | ; |
With A having a limited number of spots , it forces teams to drop down or some teams take advantage of the situation and hold out til that last minute to be put in another division. Same thing happened Sunday and that is why it is an open division. There will always be loopholes and always teams that people will blame .
| |
|
Judge
Oct 02, 2010
7:36 PM | | | ; |
its one thing to try and get cute like that but i kinda expect Tom to come in and say "listen dude you won B+ last year we saved you a spot in A dont try and tell me you lost 2 players and need to stay put."
| |
|
@Lumpy
Oct 02, 2010
8:29 PM | | | ; |
just so its clear. `A` appears to have 10 spots, not 8. Just so you know and as someone already said, banditos registered for b+ before it was full. Not trying to hurt anyones feelings, but facts are facts
| |
|
Oct 03, 2010
2:05 PM | | | ; |
why doesn`t Tom tell explain why the top four in B+ were not moved up
Simple, and as already mentioned here A filled up. Banditos did tell me they had a drop off on their roster, and they didn`t exactly do well in the Turkey Bowl or the Spring season against A competition.
If we did not have enough teams for A Banditos were #1 on the involuntary move-up list, but I do not want to prevent teams form playing in A.
Union got in too late. Their coach wanted to play A but I talked them into registering for B+. Same for Greyhounds.
All in all I think the A and B+ divisions are pretty competitive, and that`s the true goal.
| |
|
Lumpy
Greyhounds | |
Oct 03, 2010
10:36 PM | | | ; |
Re: @Lumpy - I stand corrected.
Thanks Tom for clarifying this conversation.
| |
|
|